Publications

Publications

Always up to date with PlantTec.

Ongoing clinical studies demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of 4DryField® PH:

4DryField® PH gel
4DryField® PH powder
Gynecologic Surgery
General Surgery
Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Urologic Surgery
Orthopedic Surgery
Burn Surgery
In-Vivo Studies
In-Vitro-Studies
Gynecologic Surgery
General Surgery
Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Urologic Surgery
Orthopedic Surgery
Burn Surgery
In-Vivo-Studies
In-Vitro-Studies
Gynecologic Surgery

Korell (2014): Combined Hemostasis and Adhesion Prevention with the Novel Agent 4DryField® PH — Initial Observations

Korell et al. (2016): Use of Modified Polysaccharide 4DryField® PH for Adhesion Prevention and Hemostasis in Gynecological Surgery: A Two-Center Observation Study by second-Look Laparoscopy

Ziegler et al. (2016): Uterine Perforation following a fractional curretage successfully treated with the modified polysacharide 4DryField® PH: A case report

Watrowski (2020): Unifying local hemostasis and adhesion prevention during gynaecologic laparoscopies: experiences with a novel, plant-based agent

Torres-de la Roche et al. (2020): A new approach to avoid ovarian failure as well function-impairing adhesion formation in endometrioma infertility surgery

Krämer et al. (2021): Peritoneal Adhesions and their Prevention – Current Trends

Krämer et al. (2021): Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with secondlook laparoscopy

Ziegler et al. (2021): Changed inflammatory markers after application of 4DryField® PH for adhesion prevention in gynecological surgery

Ziegler & De Wilde (2022): Reduction of adhesion formation after gynaecological adhesiolysis surgery with 4DryField® PH – a retrospective, controlled study with second look laparoscopies

Moszynski et al. (2023): Using a Modified Polysaccharide as a Hemostatic Agent Results in Less Reduction of the Ovarian Reserve after Laparoscopic Surgery of Ovarian Tumors – Prospective Study

Krämer et al. (2023): Improvement in Fertility and Pain after Endometriosis Resection and Adhesion Prevention with 4DryField® PH: Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Lisa et al. (2023): 4Synless – comparison of effectiveness of 4DryField vs. Hyalobarrier gel for prevention of relapse of Asherman’s syndrome: feasibility study

General Surgery

Kuthe (2016): Successful treatment of a chronic wall seroma with the polysaccharide 4DryField® PH – A case report

Blumhardt et al. (2018): Effect of 4DryField® PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis

Ahmad & Crescenti (2019): Significant Adhesion Reduction with 4DryField® PH after Release of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction

Liu et al. (2023): Efficacy and safety of purified starch for adhesion prevention in colorectal surgery

Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

Cesnjevar (2022): Retrospective analysis of prophylaxis of pericardial and pleural adhesions in pediatric heart surgery with and without application of the medical device 4DryField® PH

Urologic Surgery

Karsch et al. (2016): Evaluation of Lymphorrhea and Incidence of Lymphoceles: 4DryField® PH in Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy

Orthopedic Surgery

Lucas et al. (2021): Effect of 4DryField® PH on blood loss in hip bipolar hemiarthroplasty followingintracapsular femoral neck fracture – a randomized clinical trial

Burn Surgery

Stromps et al. (2014): First experiences with the hemostyptic 4DryField® PH at the Burn Center Aachen

In-Vivo Studies

Poehnert et al. (2015): Evaluation of the biological tolerability of the starch-based medical device 4DryField® PH in vitro and in vivo a rat model

Poehnert et al. (2015): Evaluation of 4DryField® PH as Adhesion Prevention Barrier Tested in an Optimized Adhesion Model in Rats

Poehnert et al. (2016): Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Peritoneal Adhesion Prevention Devices in a Rat Model

Winny et al. (2016): Treatment of de-peritonealized intestine with 4DryField® PH prevents adhesions between non-resorbable intra-peritoneal hernia mesh and bowel

Winny et al. (2016): Adhesion Prevention Efficacy of Composite Meshes Parietex®, Proceed® and 4DryField® PH Covered Polypropylene Meshes in an IPOM Rat Model

Poehnert et al. (2019): Comparison of adhesion prevention capabilities of the modified starch powder-based medical devices 4DryField® PH and Arista™ AH in the Optimized Peritoneal Adhesion Model

Poehnert et al. (2024): Comparison of adhesion prevention capabilities of the modified starch powder-based medical devices 4DryField® PH, HaemoCer™ PLUS and StarSil® in the Optimized Peritoneal Adhesion Model

In-Vitro-Studies

Hanke et al. (2011): Effects of a New Microporous Polysaccharide Powder on Viscoelastic Characteristics of Clot Formation

Sieg et al. (2017): Effects of Microporous Polysaccharide Powder in a Model of Dilution on Viscoelastic Characteristics of Clot Formation – An In-Vitro Study

Do you need
anything else?

Please feel free to contact us:

phone: +49 (0) 4131 – 39 423 60

fax: +49 (0) 4131 – 39 423 8887Dorette-von-Stern-Str 10,
21337 Lüneburg,
Germanyinfo@planttec-medical.de© 2024 PlantTec Medical GmbH -
All Rights Reserved.Site NoticePrivacy PolicyContact

Do you need
anything else?

Please feel free to contact us:

phone: +49 (0) 4131 – 39 423 60

fax: +49 (0) 4131 – 39 423 8887



Dorette-von-Stern-Str 10
21337 Lüneburg
Deutschlandinfo@planttec-medical.de© 2024 PlantTec Medical GmbH -
All Rights Reserved.ContactPrivacy PolicySite Notice